Why Macks suck

31 01 2008

 it’s not clear by now, I’m not a Mac user. Things with the Mac OS frustrate me much quicker than Windows, DOS, Unix or anything else.

I have a Windows 2000 Server at work which provides VPN access for me and the rest of my users. You connect to it by firing up any vanilla VPN client, pointing the IP to ’secure.xyzcompany.com’ and entering your Domain username/password. Viola. You’re on. You can resolve server names, access internal web-applications, or even check your email via the Exchange protocal instead of using IMAP over SSL. It’s magical and it’s slick, everyone loves it. Except me and my new Mac. When I connect with my windows box, there’s an option to “use the remote gateway”. This makes sense to me, because I know what a gateway is, and I even know why I would want to disable that. It’s also in a very convenient and logical place. You open the properties of the VPN connection, find the networking page of the config, select Internet Protocol from the connction items, then click properties. Of course we want to be using Automatic IP and DNS via DHCP, but I also have all my advanced properties just a button click away,  There’s the checkbox for my use default gateway. The Mac Setup however is somewhat more crazy. They have this little application called “internet Connect” within the Applications folder. You make your VPN, and then you’re supposed to know that you access options from a menu called Connect. Wait, connect means connect, not Options for connections… WTF?! Send all traffic over VPN connection? Um, yeah… call me crazy, but isn’t the standard name for sending traffic to a different endpoint called the “gateway”. So much for standard names.

So. The problem would be solved, except that I still can’t resolve names with my mac. For instance, the public DNS namespace of the company is XYZCompany.com. The internal namespace is XYZCOMPANY.LOCAL. This way, you HAVE to have acess to the internal nameservers to get any good info out of us. Works great with windows, where when your primary connection’s DNS fails to resolve, windows looks at the other connection’s DNS servers for some useful info. For some reason, Mac forgot this nicety. Sigh. Anyone who knows how to make this work could certainly email me and show me the error of my ways.





Selebrating legos 50th birthday

30 01 2008

LegoThe Lego Group had humble beginnings in the workshop of Ole Kirk Christiansen, a carpenter from Billund, Denmark. The word lego is an abbreviation for two Danish words leg and godt meaning play well. In 1916, Christiansen purchased a woodworking shop in Billund which had been in business since 1895. He earned his living by constructing houses and furniture for farmers in the region, with the help of a small staff of apprentices. His workshop burned down in 1924 when a fire, lit by two of his young sons, ignited some wood shavings. Undaunted, Ole Kirk took the disaster as an opportunity to construct a larger workshop, and worked towards expanding his business even further; however, the Great Depression would soon have an impact on his livelihood. In finding ways to minimize production costs, Ole Kirk began producing miniature versions of his products as design aids. It was these miniature stepladders and ironing boards that inspired him to begin producing toys.

(Note: According to a Lego employee in Denmark, Ole Kirk’s move to toy production was actually inspired by the government rather than self-motivated. Various literature appears to be to the contrary, implying that Ole Kirk actively decided to move on to toy manufacture. However, more personal recollections and retellings suggest that when Ole Kirk’s carpentry shop was going out of business in 1932, his local social worker suggested or otherwise encouraged him to make toys.)

In 1932, Ole Kirk’s shop started making wooden pull toys, piggy banks, cars and trucks. He enjoyed a modest amount of success, but families were poor and often unable to afford such toys. Farmers in the area sometimes traded food in exchange for his toys; Ole Kirk found he had to continue producing practical furniture in addition to toys in order to stay in business. In the mid-1930s, the yo-yo toy fad gave him a brief period of activity, until its sudden collapse. Once again, Ole Kirk turned disadvantage to his favor, turning the disused yo-yo parts into wheels for a toy truck. His son Godtfred began working for him, taking an active role in the company.

It was in 1934 that the company name Lego was coined. Ole Kirk held a contest amongst his staff to see who could come up with the best name for the company, offering a bottle of homemade wine as a prize. Christiansen was considering two names himself, “Legio” (with the implication of a “Legion of toys”) and “Lego”, a self-made contraction from the Danish phrase leg godt, meaning “play well.” Later the Lego Group discovered that “Lego” can be loosely interpreted as “I put together” or “I assemble” in Latin [1].

When plastic came into widespread use, Ole Kirk kept with the times and began producing plastic toys. One of the first modular toys to be produced was a truck that could be taken apart and re-assembled. In 1947, Ole Kirk and Godtfred obtained samples of interlocking plastic bricks produced by the company Kiddicraft. These “Kiddicraft Self-Locking Building Bricks” were designed and patented by Mr. Hilary Harry Fisher Page, a British citizen. [2] [3] In 1949 the Lego Group began producing similar bricks, calling them “Automatic Binding Bricks.” Lego bricks, manufactured from cellulose acetate, were developed in the spirit of traditional wooden blocks that could be stacked upon one another; however, these plastic bricks could be “locked” together. They had several round “studs” on top, and a hollow rectangular bottom. They would stick together, but not so tightly that they could not be pulled apart. In 1953, the bricks were given a new name: Lego Mursten, or “Lego Bricks.”

The use of plastic for toy manufacture was not highly regarded by retailers and consumers of the time. Many of the Lego Group’s shipments were returned, following poor sales; it was thought that plastic toys could never replace wooden ones. Despite such criticism, however, the Kirk Christiansens persevered. By 1954, Godtfred had become the junior managing director of the Lego Group. It was his conversation with an overseas buyer that struck the idea of a toy “system.” Godtfred saw the immense potential in Lego bricks to become a system for creative play, but the bricks still had some problems from a technical standpoint: their “locking” ability was limited, and they were not very versatile. It was not until 1958 that the modern-day brick design was developed. The bricks were improved with hollow tubes in the underside of the brick. This added support in the base, enabling much better locking ability and improved versatility. That same year, Ole Kirk Christiansen died, and Godtfred inherited leadership of the company.

The Lego Group matured a great deal over the next up and coming years. In 1959, the Futura division was founded within the company. Its tiny staff was responsible for generating ideas for new sets. Another warehouse fire struck the Lego Group in 1960, consuming most of the company’s inventory of wooden toys; fortunately, the Lego brick line was strong enough by then that the company decided to abandon production of wooden toys. By the end of the year, the staff of the lego group had come to be over 450 total people.

1961 and 1962 saw the introduction of the first Lego wheels, an addition that expanded the potential for building cars, trucks, busses and other vehicles from Lego bricks. Also during this time, the Lego Group introduced toys specifically targeted towards the pre-school market, and made an arrangement allowing Samsonite to begin producing and selling Lego products in Canada, an arrangement that would continue until 1988. There were more than 50 sets of bricks in the Lego System of Play by this time.

In 1963, the material used to create Lego bricks, cellulose acetate, was dropped in favor of more stable acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, or ABS plastic, which is still used today. ABS is non-toxic, is less prone to discoloration and warping, and is also more resistant to heat, acids, salt, and other chemicals than cellulose acetate. Lego bricks manufactured from ABS plastic in 1963 still hold most of their shape and color more than 40 years later, and still neatly interlock with the most recently manufactured Lego bricks.

1964 was the first time that instruction manuals were included in Lego sets.

One of the Lego Group’s most successful series, the Lego train system, was first released in 1966. The original train sets included a 4.5-volt motor and rails; two years later, a 12-volt motor was introduced.

On June 7, 1968, the first Legoland Park was opened in Billund. This theme park featured elaborate models of miniature towns built entirely from Lego bricks. The three acre (12,000 m²) park attracted 625,000 visitors in its first year alone. During the next 20 years, the park grew to more than eight times its original size, and eventually averaged close to a million paying visitors per year. More than eighteen million Lego sets were sold in 1968.

In 1969, the Duplo system went on sale. This was a newly developed system, targeted towards younger children; Duplo bricks are much larger than Lego bricks, making them safer for very young children, but the two systems are compatible: Lego bricks can be fitted neatly onto Duplo bricks, making the transition to the Lego system easily made as children outgrow their Duplo bricks. The prefix “du” in Duplo refers to the number 2, of which, a duplo brick is exactly twice the dimension of a LEGO building brick (2x height by 2x width by 2x depth = 8x the volume of a brick)

The 1960s were such a period of growth for the Lego Group that by 1970, one of the biggest questions they faced was how best to manage and control its expanding market.

By 1970, the Lego Group had a staff of more than 900. The coming decades marked considerable expansion into new frontiers of toy making and marketing. Lego began to target the female market with the introduction of furniture pieces and dollhouses in 1971. The Lego universe expanded its transportation possibilities with the addition of boat and ship sets, with hull pieces that actually floated, in 1972.

During this same period, Godtfred Kirk Christiansen’s son, Kjeld Kirk Christiansen, joined the managerial staff of the company, after earning business degrees in Switzerland and Denmark. (Kjeld’s surname is spelled with a “K”, instead of a “Ch”, due to a mistake on his birth certificate; he kept the spelling.) One of Kjeld’s first achievements with the company was the foundation of manufacturing facilities, as well as a research and development department that would be responsible for keeping the company’s manufacturing methods up to date. Human figures with posable arms made an appearance in 1974 in “Lego family” sets, which went on to become the biggest sellers at the time; in the same year, an early version of the “minifigure” miniature Lego person was introduced, but it was not posable and had no face printed on its head. A Lego production plant was opened in Enfield, Connecticut in the United States.

“Expert Series” sets were first introduced in 1975, geared towards older, more experienced Lego builders. This line soon developed into the “Expert Builder” sets, released in 1977. These technical sets featured moving parts such as gears, differentials, cogs, levers, axles and universal joints, and permitted the construction of realistic models such as automobiles, with functional rack and pinion steering and lifelike engine movements. Finally, the Lego world came together in 1978 with the addition of the Lego “minifigure” that is still known today. These small Lego people have posable arms and legs, and a friendly smile. The figure was used in many varieties of Lego sets, allowing consumers to construct elaborate towns with buildings, roads, vehicles, trains, and boats, at the same scale, and populated with the smiling minifigure Lego citizens.

Another significant expansion to the Lego line occurred in 1979, with the creation of Lego Space sets. Astronaut minifigures, rockets, lunar rovers and spaceships populated this successful series. Fabuland, a fantasy series targeted towards younger children, debuted in this year as well, as did the Scala series, featuring jewelry elements marketed towards young girls. Kjeld Kirk Kristiansen became the president of Lego in this year; another decade concluded with Lego toys still going strong.

Lego bricks had always had a constructive potential that was seen by some educators as being an invaluable asset in helping children to develop creativity and problem-solving abilities. Since the 1960s, teachers had been using Lego bricks in the classroom for a variety of reasons. In 1980, the Lego Group established the Educational Products Department (eventually renamed Lego Dacta, in 1989), specifically to expand the educational possibilities of their toys. A packing and assembly factory opened in Switzerland, followed by another in Jutland, Denmark that manufactured Lego tires.

The second generation of Lego trains appeared in 1981. As before these were available in either 4.5 V (battery powered) or 12 V (mains powered), but a much wider variety of accessories were available, including working lights, remote-controlled points and signals, and even decouplers.

The “Expert Builder” series matured in 1982, becoming the “Technic” series. August 13 of that year marked the Lego Group’s 50th anniversary; the book 50 Years of Play was published to commemorate the occasion. In the following year, the Duplo system was expanded to include sets for even younger audiences, particularly infants; new sets included baby rattles and figures with adjustable limbs. The year after, Lego minifigure citizens gained a realm of knights and horses, with the introduction of the first Castle sets. Light & Sound sets made their appearance in 1985; these sets included a battery pack with electrical lights, buzzers, and other accessories to add another dimension of realism to Lego creations. Also that year, the Lego Group’s educational division produced the Technic Computer Control, which was an educational system whereby Technic robots, trucks, and other motorized models could be controlled with a computer. Manaus, Brazil gained a Lego factory in this year, as well.

In 1984, the Technic line was expanded with the addition of pneumatic components.

This Lego model of a composite of London, including a motorized model of a London Underground train controlled by computers, can be seen in Legoland Windsor.

This Lego model of a composite of London, including a motorized model of a London Underground train controlled by computers, can be seen in Legoland Windsor.

In August of 1988, 38 children from 17 different countries took part in the first Lego World Cup building contest, held in Billund. That same year, Lego Canada was established. The Lego line grew again in 1989 with the release of the Lego Pirates series, which featured a variety of pirate ships, desert islands and treasure; the series was also the first to depart from the standard minifigure smiling face to create an array of piratical characters. The Lego Group’s Educational Products Department was renamed Lego Dakta in this year; the name is derived from the Greek word “didactic”, which roughly means “the study of the learning process.” MIT’s Dr. Seymour Papert, from the Laboratory of Computer Learning, was named “Lego Professor of Learning Research,” after his ongoing work in linking the Logo programming language with Lego products.

A new series designed for advanced builders was released in 1990. Three Model Team sets, including a race car and an off-road vehicle, featured a level of detail and realism not previously seen in any Lego series. Where Technic was mechanically accurate, Model Team was visually and stylistically accurate. The Lego Group became one of the top 10 toy companies in this year; it was the only toy company in Europe to be among the top 10. Legoland Billund had more than one million visitors in this year, for the first time in its history. The first-ever “Lego Professor of Business Dynamics,” Xavier Gilbert, was appointed to an endowed chair at the International Institute for Management Development in Lausanne, Switzerland. Lego Malaysia was also established in 1990. In 1991, the Lego Group standardized its electrical components and systems; the Trains and Technic motors were made 9V to bring the systems into line with the rest of the Lego range.

Two Guinness records were set in 1992 using Lego products: A castle made from 400,000 Lego bricks, and measuring 4.45 meters by 5.22 meters, was built on Swedish television, and a Lego railway line 545 meters in length, with three locomotives, was constructed. Duplo was augmented with the addition of the Toolo line featuring a screwdriver, wrench, nuts and bolts; the Paradisa line, targeted towards girls, brought a variety of new pastel colors into the Lego system and focused around horses and a beach theme. 1993 brought a Duplo train and a parrot-shaped “brickvac” that could scoop Lego pieces up off the floor.

A model of St Paul's Cathedral in London can be seen in Legoland Windsor. It is made of thousands of Lego bricks. The rotating model of the London Eye in the background is also made of Lego bricks.

A model of St Paul’s Cathedral in London can be seen in Legoland Windsor. It is made of thousands of Lego bricks. The rotating model of the London Eye in the background is also made of Lego bricks.

Early prototypes of the Lego minifigure had a variety of skin colors and facial expressions, but production designs used only a yellow skin color and standard smiling face. Lego Pirates in 1989 expanded the array of facial expressions by adding beards and eye patches. Soon the other themes caught on, ranging from sun glasses, lipstick, eye lashes, and so on. However, many of the older collectors resented the new look, saying they looked too “cartoon-ish” or “kiddy”, and preferred the simplistic nature of the two eyes and smile. Nevertheless, from 1999 licensed series such as Lego Star Wars and Lego Harry Potter gave minifigures the personas of specific characters from their cinematic counterparts, but it was not until 2003, with the introduction of Lego Basketball, that the palette of skin tones broadened to include more lifelike colors. [4]

In the late 1990s, the Lego Group brought out a series of new and specialized ranges aimed at particular demographics. The Bionicle range uses Technic pieces and specialist moldings to create a set of action figures for boys, while Belville is a more conventional line aimed at girls and featuring large posable figures like those in the Technic range. A “Lego 4 Juniors” group features 2-inch tall medium-sized figures (“medi-figure”) without jointed arms, and longer legs than the classic Lego minifigure. In 2003, the Lego Group introduced a completely new system, Clikits, aimed at girls and consisting of customizable plastic jewelry and accessories. In 2004, LEGO added the QUATRO brick, for ages 1-3. Much like Duplo and the “du” prefix, a Quatro brick is 4 times the dimension of a regular LEGO brick, and is compatible with the Duplo brick. Also that year, they created the second line of Knights Kingdom themed product.

The late 1990s also saw the first products featuring licensed characters. In 1999, Star Wars Lego and Winnie the Pooh Duplo were released. These were followed by characters from Harry Potter to Steven Spielberg. Before this, Lego characters were always designed in-house, and lacked the strong characterisation of these licensed characters. A number of in-house characters after this point were strongly characterised with media utilisation and non-LEGO System merchandising in mind, most notably Bionical

For more info go to legos offical website at:http://cache.lego.com/1033/anniversary.htm





Macbook air not the worlds slimmest laptop

20 01 2008

Apple’s MacWorld exhibition on the MacBook Air maybe is at present the “Listed” notebook computer the thinnest of the fuselage, but it is not Since “history” the thinnest.

In fact, the history of the thinnest notebook computer was the Pedion, as early as in 1997 has been published, by the Mitsubishi and Hewlett-Packard developed jointly.

Pedion only the thickness of 1.84 cm (0.72 inches thick). Although Air thinnest part only 0.16-inch thick (0.4 cm), but there are still some of the thickest 0.76-inch (1.93 cm), compared to the Pedion also a little thick. Mitsubishi released Pedion in the early 1998 .

However, the Pedion fate of the general, regardless of the quality or value terms, can not be called the standard. The price of 6,000 US dollars notebook computer equipped with 64 MB of memory, as well as 1 GB of hard disk capacity, and to build magnesium metal casing, the aircraft body more solid.

Even so, shortly after launch, consumers still complain of Machinery problems, Mitsubishi was forced to recall from the market this notebook. (As far as I know, HP has never launched its own version of the Pedion, but allow me to check it more).

Apple MacBook Air as the “world’s thinnest” notebook computers. However, how to interpret ( “today’s listed” or “history”), or a matter of opinion.

Other vendors have also introduced ultra-thin notebook computers. For example, Sony in 2004 selling a special edition of Sony Vaio X505 Notebook, close to the thickness of Macbook Air. This edition Vaio notebook computers is limited edition commemorative models, the thickest part of 0.8-inch, the thinnest part is only 0.38 inch. Chassis containing carbon fiber, in order to allow a more robust body.

Sony at present the thinnest notebook computer, the thickest part of 1.2-inch, the thinnest part only 0.8-inch.

In recent years, notebook computer manufacturer with focus on the 15-inch (including) more than bigger screen laptop, but Vaio product manager Xavier Lauwaert predicted that the future of the laptop new battlefield in 11-inch and 13-inch screen notebook computer market. And this laptop, broadly almost in line with Mitsubishi Pedion.

Dell recently introduced a with 13-inch screen notebook computers, Sony in the Las Vegas Consumer Electronics Show (CES) Exhibition 11-inch and 13-inch screen notebook computer. Apple Macbook Air also fall into the same type.

With notebook computers that got increasingly thin, manufacturers must be multi-exploration in the laboratory, in order to find such as carbon fiber for ultra-thin body shape of the new material.

  Read the rest of this entry »





The Zune War

19 01 2008

Ok, so you can score an iPod 80gb player right now for $249.99 right? It has the same iPod name, the pop culture following, and is a proven winner right? Right. So, why in the hell would you spend $249.99 for a Microsoft Zune 2.0 with the same storage capacity, an unproven track record, and what many think was a poor marketing attempt. Well, there are some reasons why I personally thing that the Zune 2.0 80gb could be better for you. With the help of some comparison tables over at Engadget, we can see the specs side by side. Keep in mind that the Zune 2.0 is not even on sale yet, but specs are trickling in.

OK, let’s look at them side by side…

  • The iPod Classic 80gb is .2 inches shorter and .1 inches thinner than the Zune 2. Winner: iPod Classic 80gb
  • The iPod weighs more than the Zune 2.0. Winner: Who cares, it’s negligible.
  • WiFi: Zune 2.0 has WiFi the iPod doesn’t. In fact, the Zune 2.0 can now sync wireless too! Winner: Zune 2.0 Big Time
  • Battery life: 20 hours versus 30 hours… Winner: iPod with 30 hours… Big Number, but the Zune will charge fully faster… hehe
  • File types: I could list them all, but there is only one I care about… MINE! Not Apples. DRM-Less! Winner: Zune 2.0
  • Earbuds: I don’t know what Microsoft considers “Premium”, but I doubt they will upend my Ultimate Ears. Winner: I don’t care.
  • Colors : Zune 2.0 – Black, iPod Classic Black and Silver… Winner: iPod

Will wireless sync and drm-less music be enough to get current iPod owners to change over to an unproven company in this arena? I doubt it. Do you think Microsoft is expecting PMP domination with the Zune 2.0? No, I am sure they aren’t… yet. I think they are waiting for Zune 4.7 to hit for that, eh? Little steps. It took quite a bit of time for Apple to saturate the market and get a lot of folks to put down their Sony Walkmans, it won’t happen overnight.

I am onboard for this, I love to see other companies compete. Competition breeds excellence. It also causes price changes too. If you recall back in the early 2000’s, before the Dell Axim X5 was released, a typical Pocket PC was running between $500 and $800. After the release of the X5, prices began to become easier on the wallet for many of us.

Who wins? Apple or Microsoft? I think Microsoft

Update:

iPod sales are going down and zune sales are going up. So may the zune will be the next iPod





Mac’s are safe for now

19 01 2008
Introduction

Apple has gotten a lot of mileage out of the fact that its OS X operating system has yet to be attacked by a virus. A recent ad campaign for Mac computers featured a flu-ridden individual representing a PC while the Mac guy appeared untouched by illness. Some people see it as smugness, but there is no denying that up until now Mac users have enjoyed a long stretch without any serious threats to their platform.

By contrast, according to Symantec’s latest Internet Security Threat Report, in the second half of 2006 there were more than 6 million bot-infected PCs worldwide.

Macs are vulnerable

This past January, Kevin Finisterre, an independent security researcher, caused a stir in the Apple community by creating a Web site that revealed a new Apple bug each day for an entire month. And while some critics dismissed the report as a publicity stunt, Apple recently issued a patch to plug some of the holes listed on Finisterre’s Web report.

Mike Romo, product manager for the Macintosh team at Symantec, readily admits that, historically, the Mac operating system has largely been untouched by threats, but he also warns that there simply is no such thing as an operating system impervious to risks.

“There are still plenty of viruses that can affect individual programs that people use on the Mac,” he says. For example, Microsoft macro viruses, which can be embedded in Excel spreadsheets and other office documents, target specific applications running on the Mac rather than the operating system.

In addition, Apple’s monthly security updates clearly show that software vulnerabilities, such as errors with the code or the logic of the application and how it interacts with the operating system or the Internet, are becoming increasingly common.

“As more applications are written for both the Mac and Windows, we’re seeing a lot more software vulnerabilities,” explains Romo.

Online threats are universal

Mac users have grown accustomed to operating in an environment where they’re not the primary targets of malicious exploits, but when it comes to Web threats, like phishingand ID theft, they’re just as vulnerable as users on any other platform. “If you’re using the name of the street you live on as a password, it could be very easy for someone to get access to your system regardless of what operating system you’re running,” warns Romo. There’s nothing an operating system can do to protect you from social engineering threats.

Romo recommends Norton AntiVirusfor all Mac users working on a cross-platform environment or with many Windows users. Norton AntiVirus scans incoming mail and Internet files while providing protection against viruses, worms, Trojan horses and other emerging threats. Norton Confidentialgoes a step further by offering Macs protection against platform agnostic threats such as phishing and is especially designed to help users approach online transactions with confidence. It prevents personal information from being provided to phishing Web sites, and delivers early response protection against identity thieves seeking to exploit newly discovered application and operating system vulnerabilities. It also safeguards important files from tampering or accidental deletion.

Stay protected

Romo says the fact that there have been no successful exploits against the Mac should not lull Mac users into a false sense of security. “The bottom line is that there have been no successful virus attacks on the Mac until now. But soon there will be as the numbers of macs increase so will the number of viruses.”





Apple’s 13 inch macbook air sucks

19 01 2008

Sony Vaio (worlds slimmest laptopmacbook airToday at the Macworld 2008 Expo, Steve Jobs released a new version of the Macbook called the Macbook Air. Unlike last year’s iPhone announcement, the response to the Air was negative. The price of Apple’s stock today dropped 9.02% to close at $169.04 and $163.01 in after-hours trading

Apple stocks after macbook air's release

If you’re interested in the Macbook Air, check out these specifications from the Apple Store. For $1799, you get a 0.76 inch thick, 3.0 pound notebook with a 13.3 inch backlit widescreen display, 1.6 GHz Core2 Duo processor, iSight camera, backlit keyboard, and multi-touch trackpad. It has a single USB 2 slot and a single micro-DVI slot and headphone jack via a door on the side. Wirelessly, it supports 802.11n and Bluetooth 2.1/EDR. It has no optical drive natively, and comes with a wimpy 80GB 4200 RPM hard disk. A 1.8 GHz processor and a 64GB solid-state drive (SSD) will cost $3,098.

I have to agree with Michael Arrington of Techcrunch that the laptop, even as a premium option, is grossly overpriced and underpowered. A slightly heavier, but significantly more powerful Sony Vaio (40% faster CPU, 30% faster hard disk, more ports, fingerprint sensor, nvidia graphics, twice as much hard disk space, slightly thicker, slightly heavier, same height and width) can be bought for $1800. If you go to Dell, you can configure their 13.3-inch widescreen XPS M1330 with an SSD drive and a few upgrades for just $2,404, a significant savings over Apple’s price.

It’s interesting that Kineda and Paulboth point out seriously problems with the new Macbook (it’s wimpy, overpriced, and full of proprietary non-replaceable, non-upgradable parts) but still cheer it on. Paul says,

News flash to Devin people don’t buy ultra-portable notebooks for their workstation-like performance. Enough said. Do I want one? Hell yes.

But, it’s Daring Fireballwho finally gets to the bottom of the Macbook Air, and why it sucks. It just doesn’t make the right design choice! Thinner is not the same as smaller; we want a 12″ or 11″ or 10″ model, both smaller in form factor and thinner and lighter to boot:

I’d have rather seen a smaller footprint, a la the old 12-inch PowerBook G4 — something just exactly as wide as a full keyboard. I’d prefer to sacrifice screen size on the notebook in exchange for an even smaller machine.

Update: Did you know that just in 2007, Sony made the Vaio X505, a laptop .1″ thick, and sony just made a ultra slim and ultra portable laptop?  Perhaps more false advertising apple. Can’t wait till Apple, Dell and Microsoft sues them.

ultra-slim vaio

Pwnt, Apple. That’s all I can say!

Another update (January 24 2008)

Apple released macbook air’s tv ad saying it is the worlds slimmest laptop. Of course by reading this article looking at http://pcsource.wordpress.com/2008/01/20/macbook-air-not-the-worlds-slimmest-laptop/ you see that it is not. Anyways there is five lawsuits agents apple right now and sony is going to court with apple first.





The Zune war

19 01 2008

zune-versus-ipod-440Ok, so you can score an iPod 80gb player right now for $249.99 right? It has the same iPod name, the pop culture following, and is a proven winner right? Right. So, why in the hell would you spend $249.99 for a Microsoft Zune 2.0 with the same storage capacity, an unproven track record, and what many think was a poor marketing attempt. Well, there are some reasons why I personally thing that the Zune 2.0 80gb could be better for you. With the help of some comparison tables over at Engadget, we can see the specs side by side. Keep in mind that the Zune 2.0 is not even on sale yet, but specs are trickling in.

OK, let’s look at them side by side…

  • The iPod Classic 80gb is .2 inches shorter and .1 inches thinner than the Zune 2. Winner: iPod Classic 80gb
  • The iPod weighs more than the Zune 2.0. Winner: Who cares, it’s negligible.
  • WiFi: Zune 2.0 has WiFi the iPod doesn’t. In fact, the Zune 2.0 can now sync wireless too! Winner: Zune 2.0 Big Time
  • Battery life: 20 hours versus 30 hours… Winner: iPod with 30 hours… Big Number, but the Zune will charge fully faster… hehe
  • File types: I could list them all, but there is only one I care about… MINE! Not Apples. DRM-Less! Winner: Zune 2.0
  • Earbuds: I don’t know what Microsoft considers “Premium”, but I doubt they will upend my Ultimate Ears. Winner: I don’t care.
  • Colors : Zune 2.0 – Black, iPod Classic Black and Silver… Winner: iPod

Will wireless sync and drm-less music be enough to get current iPod owners to change over to an unproven company in this arena? I doubt it. Do you think Microsoft is expecting PMP domination with the Zune 2.0? No, I am sure they aren’t… yet. I think they are waiting for Zune 4.7 to hit for that, eh? Little steps. It took quite a bit of time for Apple to saturate the market and get a lot of folks to put down their Sony Walkmans, it won’t happen overnight.

I am onboard for this, I love to see other companies compete. Competition breeds excellence. It also causes price changes too. If you recall back in the early 2000’s, before the Dell Axim X5 was released, a typical Pocket PC was running between $500 and $800. After the release of the X5, prices began to become easier on the wallet for many of us.

Who wins? Apple or Microsoft? I think Microsoft

Update:

iPod sales are going down and zune sales are going up. So may the zune will be the next iPod





Mac’s are safe, for now

19 01 2008

Virus macIntroduction

Apple has gotten a lot of mileage out of the fact that its OS X operating system has yet to be attacked by a virus. A recent ad campaign for Mac computers featured a flu-ridden individual representing a PC while the Mac guy appeared untouched by illness. Some people see it as smugness, but there is no denying that up until now Mac users have enjoyed a long stretch without any serious threats to their platform.

By contrast, according to Symantec’s latest Internet Security Threat Report, in the second half of 2006 there were more than 6 million bot-infected PCs worldwide.

Macs are vulnerable

This past January, Kevin Finisterre, an independent security researcher, caused a stir in the Apple community by creating a Web site that revealed a new Apple bug each day for an entire month. And while some critics dismissed the report as a publicity stunt, Apple recently issued a patch to plug some of the holes listed on Finisterre’s Web report.

Mike Romo, product manager for the Macintosh team at Symantec, readily admits that, historically, the Mac operating system has largely been untouched by threats, but he also warns that there simply is no such thing as an operating system impervious to risks.

“There are still plenty of viruses that can affect individual programs that people use on the Mac,” he says. For example, Microsoft macro viruses, which can be embedded in Excel spreadsheets and other office documents, target specific applications running on the Mac rather than the operating system.

In addition, Apple’s monthly security updates clearly show that software vulnerabilities, such as errors with the code or the logic of the application and how it interacts with the operating system or the Internet, are becoming increasingly common.

“As more applications are written for both the Mac and Windows, we’re seeing a lot more software vulnerabilities,” explains Romo.

Online threats are universal

Mac users have grown accustomed to operating in an environment where they’re not the primary targets of malicious exploits, but when it comes to Web threats, like phishingand ID theft, they’re just as vulnerable as users on any other platform. “If you’re using the name of the street you live on as a password, it could be very easy for someone to get access to your system regardless of what operating system you’re running,” warns Romo. There’s nothing an operating system can do to protect you from social engineering threats.

Romo recommends Norton AntiVirusfor all Mac users working on a cross-platform environment or with many Windows users. Norton AntiVirus scans incoming mail and Internet files while providing protection against viruses, worms, Trojan horses and other emerging threats. Norton Confidentialgoes a step further by offering Macs protection against platform agnostic threats such as phishing and is especially designed to help users approach online transactions with confidence. It prevents personal information from being provided to phishing Web sites, and delivers early response protection against identity thieves seeking to exploit newly discovered application and operating system vulnerabilities. It also safeguards important files from tampering or accidental deletion.

Stay protected

Romo says the fact that there have been no successful exploits against the Mac should not lull Mac users into a false sense of security. “The bottom line is that there have been no successful virus attacks on the Mac until now. But soon there will be as the numbers of macs increase so will the number of viruses.”